Jason Dollar . Net

Why Evangelicals Hate Jesus [Part 2]

On my previous post, I began interacting with Phil Zuckerman on his Huffington Post article, “Why Evangelicals Hate Jesus.”

His article has the stench of mindless, hateful rhetoric, which is especially clear when one counts the sheer number of logical fallacies he commits, and his inaccuracies in interpreting polling data.

In this post, I will continue the conversation. Zuckerman’s comments are inboxed while my responses are in between. Headings are mine.

JESUS AND GUN CONTROL

Jesus exhorted humans to be loving, peaceful, and non-violent. And yet Evangelicals are the group of Americans most supportive of easy-access weaponry, little-to-no regulation of handgun and semi-automatic gun ownership, not to mention the violent military invasion of various countries around the world.

Christians are also the people who started World Vision, Compassion International, Samaritan’s Purse, and thousands of other missions agencies designed to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and attempt to improve lives all around the world.

Christians who are against gun control (and there are many, many, many who are in favor) are against it because they do not see guns and weapons as the real problem. The implied caricature that Zuckermans paints is that Christians want to give gun access to the looniest loons in the land, allowing them to use the weapons to commit crimes. Pro-gun Christians are not pro-crime. They just don’t see the gun as the problem. They see the heart of the person as the problem.

Its like this – lots of people drive cars everyday. Sometimes a loon will get behind the wheel of a car, perhaps drunk, and will injury or kill many others on the roadway. Is the problem the car? No, the problem is the loon. Banning cars is not the solution. Making sure a loon doesn’t get one is a better solution.

As far as supporting violent wars, Zuckerman knows that many people on both sides of this divide are in favor of the quick, violent use of force, and many people on both sides are in favor of slower, more diplomatic approaches.

Perhaps because Christians have a strong foundation for justice, they are quicker to see a violent attack as a just response to evil activities (like Sept 11 for example).

Either way, Christians have long articulated the Just War Theory as an approriate guide to conscious on matters of war and peace. Many of us in the conservative Christian camp absolutely hate war in every sense. We want nothing to do with guns or tanks, and see the Gospel as the most powerful force at work in the world.

Zuckerman has done a very poor job in truly representing Christian views on these issues, and nuaced reasons why they hold these various views. Certainly, it isn’t because they “hate Jesus.”

JESUS, WEALTH AND THE POOR

Jesus was very clear that the pursuit of wealth was inimical to the Kingdom of God, that the rich are to be condemned, and that to be a follower of Him means to give one’s money to the poor. And yet Evangelicals are the most supportive of corporate greed and capitalistic excess, and they are the most opposed to institutional help for the nation’s poor — especially poor children.

Jesus was not opposed to the pursuit of wealth. He was opposed to the pursuit of wealth as one’s priority in life. “Seek first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness, and then all these things will be added to you.”

As John Wesley famously preached, the Bible’s first teaching on money is to get as much of it as one can in an honest way, while setting aside appropriate times for rest and worship. To do otherwise is considered lazy and wasteful. Just read the Proverbs to see this.

It is precisely because the Samaritan had the means that he was able to give so much to the man who had been beaten by the side of the road.

Additionally, there is not an evangelical alive who is “supportive of corporate greed.” There are many evangelicals who are in favor of people and companies having the freedom to make a lot of money in honest ways, but greed, especially in many of its illegal forms is not something evangelicals hope and push for! Do you see how horrible Zuckerman’s reasoning process is here? Are there people out there who honestly believe his conclusions? Surely not.

And again, I will remind readers that Christians have started and sustained hundreds and hundreds of charities in this country and around the world to help feed poor children. Christians who go to thousands of churches give large sums of money to support these organizations in an ongoing basis.

Mr. Zuckerman, are you aware of these organizations? Would you say the people who run and support them care about the poor or not?

JESUS AND SOCIALISM

They hate anything that smacks of “socialism,” even though that is essentially what their Savior preached. They despise food stamp programs, subsidies for schools, hospitals, job training — anything that might dare to help out those in need. Even though helping out those in need was exactly what Jesus urged humans to do.

Jesus Christ did not preach socialism. His ultimate views of government were centered on the Kingdom of God, its expansion, and His own rulership over it.

Socialism as a godless government philosophy has led to the deaths of millions and millions of people, and has proven itself to be an utter and dispicable failure. Sure it bills itself as a philosophy that helps the poor, or blue-collared, but in its outworkings it always creates two classes – the regulars who are supposedly all equal, and the powerful ruling class who always have creative ways to shut up those who oppose their programs.

Phil, you know that conservative Christians are not the only ones opposed to socialism, right? You have heard of the Libertarian Party I’m sure.

And as for “despising” these social programs that help people, again we see another logical fallacy. Christians are actively involved in starting and sustaining hospitals all across the country, opening free health clinics, offering food and clothing to the poor out of their churches and other benevolence ministries, and many times paying utility payments for this going through a hard time.

Surely readers can see that conservative Christians do not “despise” helping people. We just don’t believe the government should force a society to help people, which is ultimately what socialism is. And in the end, it helps nobody, but destroys a people. Instead, Jesus taught us to help and love others because we want to, because our heart is so inclined to.

WHY LISTEN TO ZUCKERMAN?

In short, Evangelicals are that segment of America which is the most pro-militaristic, pro-gun, and pro-corporate, while simultaneously claiming to be most ardent lovers of the Prince of Peace.

As you can see, Zuckerman’s arguments are not sound or well-founded. They aren’t even well argued. So why does he bill himself as a smart man, and why do people read his hateful, inaccurate writings as though he is speaking truth? How could a college feel comfortable retaining him an a professor?

Answer: people who hate Christianity want to see it go away. They are doing all in their power to shut it up. They know that the masses do not think and do not evaluate arguments well, and do not engage in the research needed to know the facts, so they write articles like this one and the mindless masses, who also hate Christianity, jump on the bandwagon, all pumping their fists and smiling as though some victory has been achieved. But whenever truth is shunted in this way, nobody wins.

Part 3 coming soon.

Why Evangelicals Hate Jesus [Part 1]

On the Huffington Post, March 3, sociologist Phil Zuckerman (with Dan Cady) published an article called “Why Evangelicals Hate Jesus.” In this mean-spirited article, Zuckerman discusses data from recent research on the Pew Forum about the relationship between conservative Christians and political positions on a variety of social issues (“The Tea Party and Religion“).

His conclusion is that conservative Christians do not obey Jesus, or act anything like Him. Thus, they hate him.

The article is obviously filled with logical fallacies and is not at all a decent representation of the way things really are. It is also intentionally provocative – “Hate Jesus” - the usual sign that truth is being covered or twisted.

Because of the serious nature of the topic, Zuckerman needs to be answered point-by-point. His complete article is inboxed with my responses in between (headings are mine). Note: the total conversation will cover 3 total posts.

WHITE EVANGELICALS IGNORE JESUS?

The results from a recent poll published by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (http://www.pewforum.org/Politics-and-Elections/Tea-Party-and-Religion.aspx) reveal what social scientists have known for a long time: White Evangelical Christians are the group least likely to support politicians or policies that reflect the actual teachings of Jesus.

The Pew Forum polling data is very interesting, but not very surprising. But the conclusion that Zuckerman draws here is truly unfounded, indeed ridiculous, and does not reflect accurately the data as reported by the Pew Forum.

For example, Zuckerman did not point out that, according to the polling data, nearly 46% of people who support the Tea Party, had not heard of or did not have an opinion about the conservative Christian movement. In other words, Tea Party loyalty in no absolute sense means Conservative Christian loyalty. Zuckerman falsely assumes otherwise throughout his article. He does a poor job communicating the actual numbers which severely discredits his conclusions from the outset.

In addition, Zuckerman also assumes he truly understands the teachings of Jesus, or at least that his interpretation of the teaching of Jesus must be the correct interpretation. More on this later.

THE RADICAL JESUS

It is perhaps one of the strangest, most dumb-founding ironies in contemporary American culture. Evangelical Christians, who most fiercely proclaim to have a personal relationship with Christ, who most confidently declare their belief that the Bible is the inerrant word of God, who go to church on a regular basis, pray daily, listen to Christian music, and place God and His Only Begotten Son at the center of their lives, are simultaneously the very people most likely to reject his teachings and despise his radical message.

In this paragraph, Zuckerman does make a major point, but it is not entirely accurate. There is a segment of the conservative Christian culture who are outwardly and vocally serious about following Jesus, but who are not truly aware of what He taught or how to carry it out. Many of these have spent their lives pursuing wealth or happiness in this world, while banking on Jesus’ help for the next world.

A recent book by Pastor David Platt called Radical addresses this problem among those of us who take Jesus seriously. The book has earned praise and criticism, and certainly deserves both, but it is an example of the in-house awareness on the part of Christian leaders that many Christians are not being faithful to the teachings of Jesus.


  
On the other hand Zuckerman’s comments here are misleading. He says Evangelical Christians are the very people “most likely to reject [Jesus'] teachings and despise His radical message.”

I disagree. It seems clear that those who do not respect Jesus’ authority and have no intention of bowing to Him as Lord are the ones “most likely” to reject His message. Just because a person is for gun control or social programs does not mean prima facie that he is following the teachings of Jesus.

In addition, those who are not interested in honoring the Lordship of Christ will certainly not listen to the following teachings of Jesus (I limit this list to two teachings to make the point):

JESUS ON LUST AND DIVORCE

Matthew 5:28-32  “But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell.  And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell. It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery. And whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.”

I can’t imagine someone who did not consciously follow Jesus much caring about this teaching of Jesus on the avoidance of lust and adultery. To be sure, many Christians fail miserably in this area too, but who is “most likely” to fail? The one who loves Jesus and thus struggles for sexual and marital purity, or the one who feels no allegiance at all to Jesus or His teachings?

JESUS ON KINGDOM EXPANSION

Matthew 28:18-20 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”

Believers in Jesus Christ, who genuinely hope in Him, love this passage and desire to obey Jesus in it. It is the declaration that the world, in its entirety belongs to Christ, and that His followers have the great privilege of working with Him to expand His Kingdom to the ends of the earth.

Who is “most likely” to disregard this teaching? Conservative Evangelical Christians or those who reject Him as Lord?

When Zuckerman says “the teachings of Jesus” obviously he is excluding these kinds of teachings, and redefining the ones who uses, as the next part of his article will show.

MERCY, FORGIVENESS, AND JUSTICE

Jesus unambiguously preached mercy and forgiveness. These are supposed to be cardinal virtues of the Christian faith. And yet Evangelicals are the most supportive of the death penalty, draconian sentencing, punitive punishment over rehabilitation, and the governmental use of torture.

Jesus did teach mercy and forgiveness. He demonstrated it to us (especially on the cross), and He expects it of us [Luke 11:4 for example]. But do the social issues listed by Zuckerman here automatically mean that those who support these things are not being merciful or forgiving?

I think not. Zuckerman has committed the logical fallacy known as false dilemma. He is making us think that if we are for mercy / forgiveness than there is no way we could also be for justice.

Here is a story to show Zuckerman’s lack of logic. A father of two children, a boy and a girl, comes home from work one day to find that his son has taken all of his nice dress shirts, laid them out on the floor, and squirted ketchup all over them. The father, known for his kindness and respect toward his children, is dumbfounded. How could his son have done this?

The father decides that he must punish his son. After careful consideration, the father tells the son that he will have to quit playing baseball this season, and instead mow the lawns of several homes in their neighborhood as a way of earning enough money to replace the shirts.

The son, upon hearing his sentence, sadly goes into his room and shuts the door. He loves baseball and is heartbroken that he can’t play anymore.

The boy’s sister, who has watched these events unfold, musters up the courage to speak to her dad about this. “Dad,” she says, “I thought you were a merciful and forgiving father. How could you take baseball away from him?! He loves it.”

Now in this story, the father is not lacking mercy or forgiveness, but is enacting justice. Mercy / forgiveness is not the opposite of justice. Justice can still be carried out in appropriate ways, even while mercy and forgiveness are shown through the process.

But even still, Zuckerman makes a further mistake in assuming that just because most Evangelicals are for these things, therefore they hate Jesus. There is a sizeable group of Christians who are not for these things for various thoughtful reasons, and in addition to that, those who are for these things do not see them as being in opposition to Jesus’ teaching.

For example, on the government’s use of torture, most conservative Christians are not the kind of people who just can’t wait to torture someone! It isn’t something they long to do. Rather, it is something they feel is necessary in a fallen, broken, sinful world, where obtaining certain bits of information might be the means of saving thousands of lives. To say that those who wish to use this method to protect our nation are “hating Jesus” or not following His teachings on mercy and forgiveness, is naive at best and slanderous at worst.

PART 2 of this conversation coming soon. 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...